Study study type PathologyT1T0Patientssample sizesROB Results

breast cancer (BC) breast cancer (BC)

versus GM-CSF
AE37 vaccine plus GM-CSF
Brown (AE37 plus GM-CSF vs GM-CSF), 2020
  NCT00524277
RCTbreast cancer (BC)AE37 plus GM-CSFGM-CSFPatients with HER2-positive, lymph node-positive breast cancer or high-risk lymph node-negative breast cancer.154 / 147high
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 1 % decrease in RFS/DFS (PE)
GP2 vaccine plus GM-CSF
Brown (GP2 plus GM-CSF vs GM-CSF), 2020
  NCT00524277
RCTbreast cancer (BC)GP2 plus GM-CSFGM-CSFPatients with HER2-positive, lymph node-positive breast cancer or high-risk lymph node-negative breast cancer.89 / 91high
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 3 % decrease in RFS/DFS (PE)

breast cancer - adjuvant breast cancer - adjuvant

versus endocrine therapy
abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy
MonarchE, 2021
  NCT03155997
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)abemaciclib plus endocrine therapyendocrine therapyPatients (women and men) with HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Radiotherapy and both adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were allowed, but not required.2808 / 2829high
conclusif
  • demonstrated 25 % decrease in iDFS (PE)
palbociclib
PALLAS, 2022
  NCT02513394
RCTbreast cancer - adjuvantPatients with histollogically confirmed stage II or III HR-positive BC. Before random assignment, patients had completed definitive breast surgery (and (neo)adjuvantchemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, if indicated)2884 / 2877NA
inconclusive
    no statistically significant result
palbociclib plus endocrine therapy
PENELOPE-B, 2021
  NCT01864746
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)palbociclib plus endocrine therapy according to local standars (physician's choice)placebo plus endocrine therapy according to local standars (physician's choice)Women with residual invasive disease after NACT (NACT during at least 16 weeks) in the breats or in lymph nodes, ER and/or PR positive and HER2 negative tumor.628 / 616low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 7 % decrease in iDFS (PE)
versus placebo
everolimus
Bachelot, 2022
  NCT01805271
RCTbreast cancer - adjuvanteverolimus for 2 years combined with standard endocrine therapyplacebo for 2 years combined with standard placebowomen with high-risk, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative primary breast cancer-/-NA
inconclusive
    no statistically significant result
neratinib
ExteNET, 2016
  NCT00878709
RCTbreast cancer - adjuvant, la/mBC - HER2 positive - 2nd Line (L2)neratinibplaceboWomen with locally confirmed invasive HER2-positive BC stage 1-3, who had received trastuzumab and chemotherapy.1420 / 1420low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 33 % decrease in iDFS,iDFS (PE)
  • suggested 37 % decrease in RFS/DFS,RFS/DFS
olaparib
OlympiA (BIG 6-13, NSABP B-55) unpublished
  NCT02032823
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationolaparibplacebopatients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative early breast cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants and high-risk clinicopathological factors921 / 915NA
conclusif
  • demonstrated 32 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 42 % decrease in iDFS (PE)
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE-522, 2020
  NCT03036488
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationpembrolizumabplacebopreviously previously untreated, nonmetastatic disease, stage II or stage III, triple-negative breast cancer treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin, treated for neoadjuvant phase and an adjuvant phase;784 / 390low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 12.6-fold increase in pCR (PE)
  • suggested 37 % decrease in events or deaths (EFS) (PE)
versus trastuzumab
trastuzumab emtansine
KATHERINE, 2019
  NCT01772472
RCTes-BC - HER2 positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA)trastuzumab emtasine (T-DM1)trastuzumabPatients had histologically confirmed, HER2-positive, nonmetastatic, invasive primary breast cancer and if residual invasive disease after completion of taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy ad and had to have completed at least six cycles (16 weeks) of a conventional preoperative chemotherapy regimen containing a minimum of 9 weeks of taxane-based therapy and 9 weeks of trastuzumab therapy.743 / 743high
conclusif
  • inconclusive 30 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 50 % decrease in iDFS (PE)

es-BC - HER2 negative - (neo)adjuvant (NA) breast cancer - HER2-positive es-BC - HER2 negative - (neo)adjuvant (NA)

versus paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide
pembrolizumab plus paclitxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide
I-SPY2, 2020
  NCT01042379
RCTes-BC - HER2 negative - (neo)adjuvant (NA)pembrolizumab plus paclitxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamidepaclitaxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamidePatients with ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative breast cance, women treated with neoadjuvant for early-stage breast cancer (stage II or III)69 / 181high
inconclusive
  • suggested 2.7-fold increase in pCR (PE)

es-BC - HER2 positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA) breast cancer - HER2-positive es-BC - HER2 positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA)

versus lapatinib plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel
trastuzumab plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel
GeparQuinto, 2012
  NCT00567554
RCTes-BC - HER2 positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA)trastuzumab plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxellapatinib plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxelWomen with previouscly untreated unilateral or bilateral primary invasive breast carcinoma, with HER2-positive309 / 311NA
conclusif
  • demonstrated 48 % increase in pCR (PE)
versus trastuzumab
trastuzumab emtansine
KATHERINE, 2019
  NCT01772472
RCTes-BC - HER2 positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA)trastuzumab emtasine (T-DM1)trastuzumabPatients had histologically confirmed, HER2-positive, nonmetastatic, invasive primary breast cancer and if residual invasive disease after completion of taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy ad and had to have completed at least six cycles (16 weeks) of a conventional preoperative chemotherapy regimen containing a minimum of 9 weeks of taxane-based therapy and 9 weeks of trastuzumab therapy.743 / 743high
conclusif
  • inconclusive 30 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 50 % decrease in iDFS (PE)
versus trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy
trastuzumab emtansine
Harbeck (TDM-1), 2017 RCTes-BC - HER2 positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA), es-BC - HR positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA)trastuzumab emtasinetrastuzumab plus endocrine therapyWomen older than 18yr with histologically confirmed unilateral primary BC, no evidence of distant metastasis, ER and/or PR-positive and HER2-positive who were candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible119 / 129NA
suggested
  • suggested 2.9-fold increase in pCR (PE)
trastuzumab emtasine plus endocrine therapy
Harbeck (TDM1 plus ET), 2017
  NCT01817452
RCTes-BC - HER2 positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA), es-BC - HR positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA)trastuzumab emtasine plus endocrine therapytrastuzumab plus endocrine therapyWomen older than 18yr with histologically confirmed unilateral primary BC, no evidence of distant metastasis, ER and/or PR-positive and HER2-positive who were candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible-/-NA
suggested
  • suggested 3.0-fold increase in pCR (PE)

la/mBC - HER2 positive - 1st Line (L1) breast cancer - HER2-positive la/mBC - HER2 positive la/mBC - HER2 positive - 1st Line (L1)

versus trastuzumab
pertuzumab plus trastuzumab
PERTAIN, 2018
  NCT01491737
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 1st Line (L1)pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus an AI (letrozole or anastrozole)trastuzumab plus an AI (letrozole or anastrozole)Postmenopausal patients, with first-line HER2-positive and HR positive disease129 / 129NA
conclusif
  • demonstrated 35 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy
trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy
SYSUCC-002, 2022
  NCT01950182
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 1st Line (L1), la/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)trastuzumab plus endocrine therapytrastuzumab plus chemotherapyFemale patients aged of 18 or more, with locally histology confirmed mBC, HR-positive (ER and/or PR-positive) and HER2-positive196 / 196some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 12 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus trastuzumab plus docetaxel
bevacizumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel
AVEREL, 2013
  NCT00391092
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 1st Line (L1)bevacizumab plus docetaxel plus trastuzumabdocetaxel plus trastuzumabPatients with HER2-positive measurable or evaluable locally recurrent or metastatic BC, ad received no prior trastuzumab or chemotherapy for LR/MBC216 / 208some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 18 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel
PUFFIN, 2020
  NCT02896855
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 1st Line (L1)pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxelplacebo plus trastuzumab plus docetaxelPatients with HER2-positive, locally recurrent or metastatic BC, no prior therapy for metastatic disease, 18yr or older.-/-NA
suggested
  • suggested 31 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS)
CLEOPATRA, 2012
  NCT00567190
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 1st Line (L1)pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxelplacebo plus trastuzumab plus docetaxelPatients with locally recurrent, unresectable, or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer who had not received chemotherapy or biologic therapy for their metastatic disease. They may have received one hormonal treatment for metastatic breast cancer before randomization, and/or adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab before randomization402 / 406low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 34 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 38 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • suggested 31 % decrease in deaths (OS) (extension)
  • suggested 31 % decrease in PFS (extension)
  • more...

la/mBC - HER2 positive - 2nd Line (L2) breast cancer - HER2-positive la/mBC - HER2 positive la/mBC - HER2 positive - 2nd Line (L2)

versus lapatinib
lapatinib plus trastuzumab
EGF104900, 2010
  NCT00320385
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 2nd Line (L2)lapatinib plus trastuzumablapatinib monotherapyPatients with HER2-positive mBC who had experienced progression on prior trastuzumab-based therapy. Patients must have received prior anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting.148 / 148some concern
suggested
  • suggested 26 % decrease in deaths (OS)
  • suggested 26 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus lapatinib plus capecitabine
neratinib plus capecitabine
NALA, 2020
  NCT01808573
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 2nd Line (L2)neratinib plus capecitabinelapatinib plus capecitabinePateints with centrally confirmed HER2-positive mBC, and ≥ 2 previous HER2-directed therapies for mBC. Patients with brain metastases were eligible unless they had symptomatic or unstable brain metastases.307 / 314some concern
conclusif
  • inconclusive 12 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 24 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
NALA (brain metastases), 2020
  NCT01808573
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 2nd Line (L2)neratinib plus capecitabinelapatinib plus capecitabinePatients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive mBC, and ≥ 2 previous HER2-directed therapies for mBC. Patients with brain metastases were eligible unless they had symptomatic or unstable brain metastases.For this comparison, patients with brain metastases51 / 50some concern
inconclusive
    no statistically significant result
trastuzumab emtansine
EMILIA, 2012
  NCT00829166
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 2nd Line (L2)trastuzumab emtansinelapatinib plus capecitabinepatients with HER2-positive unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, who had previously been treated with trastuzumab and a taxane.495 / 496some concern
conclusif
  • demonstrated 32 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 35 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • suggested 25 % decrease in deaths (OS) (extension)
  • demonstrated 73 % increase in objective responses (ORR) (PE)
versus placebo
neratinib
ExteNET, 2016
  NCT00878709
RCTbreast cancer - adjuvant, la/mBC - HER2 positive - 2nd Line (L2)neratinibplaceboWomen with locally confirmed invasive HER2-positive BC stage 1-3, who had received trastuzumab and chemotherapy.1420 / 1420low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 33 % decrease in iDFS,iDFS (PE)
  • suggested 37 % decrease in RFS/DFS,RFS/DFS
versus trastuzumab emtansine
trastuzumab deruxtecan
DESTINY Breast03, 2022
  NCT03529110
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 2nd Line (L2)trastuzumab deruxtecantrastuzumab emtansinepatients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane-/-some concern
suggested
  • suggested 45 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS)
  • suggested 72 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS)
versus trastuzumab plus capecitabine
lapatinib plus capecitabine
WJOG6110B/ELTOP, 2018
  UMIN000005219
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 2nd Line (L2)lapatinib plus capecitabinetrastuzumab plus capecitabineWomen, aged 20yr or older, cith HER2-positive mBC or unresectable locally advanced BC who were previously treated with taxanes, with progression on trastuzumab-containing regimens43 / 43NA
suggested
  • inconclusive 19 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
tucatinib plus trastuzumab plus capecitabine
HER2CLIMB (patients with brain metastases), 2020
  NCT02614794
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 2nd Line (L2)tucatinib plus trastuzumab plus capecitabineplacebo plus trastuzumab plus capecitabinePatients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, had previously been treated with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine. Patients with brain metastases were included unless they were in need of immediate local intervention (enrolled subsequently), or with untreated brain metastases larger than 2 cm in diameter could be enrolled with approval from the medical monitor.198 / 93low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 52 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
HER2CLIMB, 2020
  NCT02614794
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 2nd Line (L2)tucatinib plus trastuzumab plus capecitabineplacebo plus trastuzumab plus capecitabinePatients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, had previously been treated with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine. Patients with brain metastases were included unless they were in need of immediate local intervention (enrolled subsequently), or with untreated brain metastases larger than 2 cm in diameter could be enrolled with approval from the medical monitor.410 / 202low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 34 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 46 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy
margetuximab plus chemotherapy
SOPHIA, 2021
  NCT02492711
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 2nd Line (L2)margetuximab plus chemotherapy (capecitabine or eribulin or gemcitabine or vinorelbine)trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (capecitabine or eribulin or gemcitabine or vinorelbine)Patients with confirmed ERBB2-positive advanced BC by local or optional central testing of themost recent biopsy, and must have had progressive disease after 2 or more lines of prior ERBB2 targeted therapy (including pertuzumab) and 1 to 3 lines of nonhormonal metastatic BC therapy.266 / 270some concern
conclusif
  • inconclusive 11 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 24 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • inconclusive 49 % increase in objective responses (ORR) (PE)
versus trastuzumab plus vinorelbine
afatinib plus vinorelbine
LUX-Breast 1, 2016
  NCT01125566
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 2nd Line (L2)afatinib plus vinorelbinetrastuzumab plus vinorelbineWomen with histollogically confirmed HER2 overexpressing and metastatic BC. Patient ad to have progressive disease following adjuvant treatment or first-line treatment for metastatic disease with trastuzumab.339 / 169some concern
inconclusive
  • statistically significant 48 % increase in deaths (OS)
  • inconclusive 10 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)

es-BC - HR positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA) breast cancer - HR positive es-BC - HR positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA)

versus trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy
trastuzumab emtansine
Harbeck (TDM-1), 2017 RCTes-BC - HER2 positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA), es-BC - HR positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA)trastuzumab emtasinetrastuzumab plus endocrine therapyWomen older than 18yr with histologically confirmed unilateral primary BC, no evidence of distant metastasis, ER and/or PR-positive and HER2-positive who were candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible119 / 129NA
suggested
  • suggested 2.9-fold increase in pCR (PE)
trastuzumab emtasine plus endocrine therapy
Harbeck (TDM1 plus ET), 2017
  NCT01817452
RCTes-BC - HER2 positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA), es-BC - HR positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA)trastuzumab emtasine plus endocrine therapytrastuzumab plus endocrine therapyWomen older than 18yr with histologically confirmed unilateral primary BC, no evidence of distant metastasis, ER and/or PR-positive and HER2-positive who were candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible-/-NA
suggested
  • suggested 3.0-fold increase in pCR (PE)

es-BC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1) breast cancer - HR positive es-BC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)

versus letrozole
taselisib plus letrozole
LORELEI, 2019
  NCT02273973
RCTes-BC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)taselisib plus letrozoleplacebo plus letrozolePostmenopausal women (aged >= 18yr), with operable stage I-III invasive BC HR-positive (ER positive) and HER2-negative166 / 168low
suggested
  • suggested 55 % increase in objective responses (ORR) (PE)
  • inconclusive 2.1-fold increase in pCR (PE)

la/mBC - HR positive breast cancer - HR positive la/mBC - HR positive

versus capecitabine
palbociclib plus endocrine therapy
KCSG-BR15-10, 2019
  NCT02592746
RCTla/mBC - HR positivepalbociclib plus exemestanecapecitabinePremenopausal women aged 19 years or older with histologically confirmed, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic or recurrent breast cancer were eligible.92 / 86NA
suggested
  • suggested 34 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus fulvestrant
buparlisib plus fulvestrant
BELLE-2 (patients with known PI3K status), 2017
  NCT01610284
RCTla/mBC - HR positivebuparlisib plus fulvestrantplacebo plus fulvestrantPostmenopausal women (>=18yr), with histollogically confirmed HR-positive and HER2-negative inoperable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (with progession on or after aromatase ihnibitor treatment). This subgroup population included ptients with a PI3K status known (activated or not)427 / 424low
conclusif
  • inconclusive 9 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 20 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)

la/mBC - HR positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA) breast cancer - HR positive la/mBC - HR positive la/mBC - HR positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA)

versus letrozole
alpelisib plus letrozole
NEO-ORB (wild type cohort), 2019
  NCT01923168
RCTla/mBC - HR positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA)alpelisib plus letrozoleletrozolePostmenopausal women with locally confirmed, HR , HER2−, T1c-T3 operable breast cancer with known PIK3CA mutation status, who had not previously received treatment with local or systemic therapy and were considered eligible for neoadjuvant endocrine therapy were included in this study.131 / 126NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 11 % increase in objective responses (ORR) (PE)
  • inconclusive 68 % increase in pCR (PE)
NEO-ORB (mutant cohort), 2019
  NCT01923168
RCTla/mBC - HR positive - (neo)adjuvant (NA)alpelisib plus letrozoleletrozolePostmenopausal women with locally confirmed, HR , HER2−, T1c-T3 operable breast cancer with known PIK3CA mutation status, who had not previously received treatment with local or systemic therapy and were considered eligible for neoadjuvant endocrine therapy were included in this study.-/-NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 6 % decrease in objective responses (ORR) (PE)
  • inconclusive 45 % decrease in pCR (PE)

la/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1) breast cancer - HR positive la/mBC - HR positive la/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)

versus aromatase inhibitor
abemaciclib plus aromatase inhibitor
MONARCH 3, 2017
  NCT02246621
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitorplacebo plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitorPostmenopausal women (aged 18 or more)with locally advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative locoregionally recurrent BC328 / 165low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 46 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus endocrine therapy
abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy
MonarchE, 2021
  NCT03155997
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)abemaciclib plus endocrine therapyendocrine therapyPatients (women and men) with HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Radiotherapy and both adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were allowed, but not required.2808 / 2829high
conclusif
  • demonstrated 25 % decrease in iDFS (PE)
palbociclib plus endocrine therapy
PENELOPE-B, 2021
  NCT01864746
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)palbociclib plus endocrine therapy according to local standars (physician's choice)placebo plus endocrine therapy according to local standars (physician's choice)Women with residual invasive disease after NACT (NACT during at least 16 weeks) in the breats or in lymph nodes, ER and/or PR positive and HER2 negative tumor.628 / 616low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 7 % decrease in iDFS (PE)
versus exemestane plus ridaforolimus
dalotuzumab plus ridaforolimus plus exemestane
MK-8669-064, 2017
  NCT01605396
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)dalotuzumab plus ridaforolimus plus exemestaneridaforolimus plus exemestanePatients with metastatic or locally advanced ER-positive and HER2-negative BC40 / 40some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 18 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus fulvestrant
cediranib plus fulvestrant
NCT00454805, 2013
  NCT00454805
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)cediranib plus fulvestrantfulvestrantPostmenopausal women with histologically/cytologically confirmed hormone-sensitive BC, with evidence of metastatic disease.-/-high
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 13 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
lapatinib plus fulvestrant
CALGB 40302, 2014
  NCT00390455
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)lapatinib plus fulvestrantplacebo plus fulvestrantPostmenauposal women with stage III or IV HR-positive BC (Er and/or PR positive). Originally with HER2-positive, then an amendment to include tumors regardless of HER2 status. Patients had one or two prior endocrine treatments for at least 3 months without tumor progression in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting.-/-NA
suggested
  • inconclusive 4 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus letrozole
lapatinib plus letrozole
EGF30008 (all population), 2009
  NCT00073528
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)lapatinib plus letrozoleplacebo plus letrozolePostmenopausal women with histologically confirmed stage IIIB/IIIC or IV, with HR positive. No prior therapy for advanced/metastatic BC was allowed, bu prior (neo)adjuvant antiestrogen therapy was allowed.642 / 644NA
conclusif
  • demonstrated 14 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
EGF30008 (HER2-positive), 2009
  NCT00073528
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)lapatinib plus letrozoleplacebo plus letrozolePostmenopausal women with histologically confirmed stage IIIB/IIIC or IV, with HR positive. No prior therapy for advanced/metastatic BC was allowed, bu prior (neo)adjuvant antiestrogen therapy was allowed.111 / 108NA
conclusif
  • demonstrated 29 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 60 % decrease in CBR
  • statistically significant 60 % decrease in objective responses (ORR)
Adding lapatinib to letrozole improve significantly PFS for patients with HR-positive and HER2-positive breast cancer
palbociclib plus letrozole
PALOMA-1, 2016
  NCT00721409
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)palbociclib plus letrozoleletrozolePostmenopausal women with ER-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Enrolled in 2 separate cohorts (cohort 1: ER-positive and HER2-negative / cohort 2: they were also required to have cancers with amplification of cyclin D1 (CCND1), loss of p16 (also known as INK4A or CDKN2A), or both)84 / 81high
suggested
  • suggested 51 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
PALOMA-2, 2016
  NCT01740427
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)palbociclib plus letrozoleplacebo plus letrozolePostmenopausal women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer were eligible for enrollment if they had not received prior systemic therapy for advanced disease.444 / 222NA
conclusif
  • demonstrated 42 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • suggested 44 % decrease in PFS (extension)
ribociclib plus letrozole
MONALEESA-2, 2016
  NCT01958021
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)ribociclib plus letrozoleplacebo plus letrozolePostmenauposal women with locally confirmed HR-positive, HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic BC who had not received previous systematic therapy for advanced disease334 / 334low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 24 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 44 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus paclitaxel
capivasertib plus paclitaxel
BEECH, 2019
  NCT01625286
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)capivasertib plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelpatients with ER-positive advanced breast cancer with or without a PIK3CA mutation receiving chemotherapy for the first time in the advanced setting54 / 56low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 20 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy
trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy
SYSUCC-002, 2022
  NCT01950182
RCTla/mBC - HER2 positive - 1st Line (L1), la/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)trastuzumab plus endocrine therapytrastuzumab plus chemotherapyFemale patients aged of 18 or more, with locally histology confirmed mBC, HR-positive (ER and/or PR-positive) and HER2-positive196 / 196some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 12 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)

la/mBC - HR positive - L1 - PIK3CA mutant breast cancer - HR positive la/mBC - HR positive la/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1) la/mBC - HR positive - L1 - PIK3CA mutant

versus paclitaxel
ipatasertib plus paclitaxel
IPATunity130, 2022
  NCT03337724
RCTla/mBC - HR positive - L1 - PIK3CA mutantipatasertib plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelPatients with HR-positive and HER2-negative PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered measurable advanced breast cancer146 / 76low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 0 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)

la/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2) breast cancer - HR positive la/mBC - HR positive la/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)

versus chemotherapy
OBI-822/OBI-821 plus cyclophosphamide
Huang, 2020
  NCT01516307
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)OBI-822/OBI-821 plus cyclophsophamidecyclophsophamideWomen with MBC achieving SD, partial response (PR), or complete response (CR) after at least one anticancer therapy and with no more than two events of progressive disease after MBC diagnosis. Patients with HR positive were allowed to continue antihormonal therapy with study treatment225 / 124NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 4 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus endocrine therapy
ganitumab plus endocrine therapy
QUILT-2.015, 2013
  NCT00626106
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)ganitumumab plus exemestane or fulvetrantplacebo plus exemestane or fulvestrantpostmenopausal women with histologically confirmed HR positive breast cancer and locally advanced or metastatic disease that could not be cured by surgery or radiation. patients from outpatient clinics and hospitals. All patients had HR-positive disease-/-low
inconclusive
  • statistically significant 78 % increase in deaths (OS)
  • inconclusive 17 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
ribociclib plus endocrine therapy
MONALEESA-7, 2018
  NCT02278120
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)ribociclib plus endocrine therapy plus goserelinplacebo plus endocrine therapy plus goserelinWomen premenopausal or perimenopausal at the time of entry, with histologically or cytologically confirmed HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer.335 / 337low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 45 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus exemestane
entinostat plus exemestane
E2112, 2021
  NCT02115282
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)entinostat plus exemestaneplacebo plus exemestaneWomen and men who had histologically confirmed invasive adenocarcinoma of the breast, metastatic or locally advanced and not amenable to local therapy with curative intent305 / 303low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 1 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • inconclusive 13 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
ENCORE301, 2013
  NCT00676663
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)entinostat plus exemestaneplacebo plus exemestanePostmenopausal women with ER-positive BC who were experiencing disease relapse or progression while receiving an NSAI64 / 66NA
suggested
  • suggested 41 % decrease in deaths (OS)
  • inconclusive 27 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
tucidinostat plus exemestane
ACE, 2019
  NCT02482753
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)tucidinostat plus exemestaneplacebo plus exemestanePostmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative, inoperable BC, whose disese relapsed after at least one endocrine therapy.244 / 121low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 25 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus fulvestrant
abemaciclib plus fulvestrant
MONARCH 2, 2020
  NCT02107703
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)abemaciclib plus fulvestrantplacebo plus fulvestrantWomen with HR-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast (ABC) cancer who progressed during neoadjuvant or adjuvantendocrine therapy (ET), within 12months after adjuvant ET, or while receiving first line ET for ABC446 / 223low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 24 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 45 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
alpelisib plus fulvestrant
SOLAR-1 (patients with PIK3CA mutant status), 2019
  NCT02437318
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)alpelisib plus fulvestrantplacebo plus fulvestrantPatients were men and postmenauposal women with locally advanced confirmed HR positive, HER2 negative breast cancer169 / 172low
conclusif
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 35 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
SOLAR-1 (patients without PIK3CA mutant status), 2019
  NCT02437318
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)alpelisib plus fulvestrantplacebo plus fulvestrantPatients were men and postmenauposal women with locally advanced confirmed HR positive, HER2 negative breast cancer / Patient has recurrence or progression of disease during or after AI therapy115 / 116low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 15 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
buparlisib plus fulvestrant
BELLE-3, 2018
  NCT01633060
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)buparlisib plus fulvestrantplacebo plus fulvestrantPostmenopausal women (aged >= 18yr) with HR-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer pretreated with aromatase inhibitors and resistant to endocrine therapy for advanced BC.289 / 143NA
conclusif
  • demonstrated 33 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
dalpiciclib plus fulvestrant
DAWNA-1, 2021
  NCT03927456
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)dalpiciclib plus fulvetrantplacebo (matching dulpaciclib) plus fulvestrantWomen aged of 18-75yr with pathologically confirmed HR-positive and HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic BC. Nor more than 1 previous chemotherapy for advanced disease.241 / 120low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 58 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
palbociclib plus fulvestrant
FLIPPER, 2021
  NCT02690480
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)palbociclib plus fulvestrantplacebo plus fulvestrantPostmenauposal women with HR-positive and HER-negative advanced breast cancer94 / 95low
suggested
  • suggested 45 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
PALOMA-3, 2016
  NCT01942135
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)palbociclib plus fulvestrantplacebo plus fulvestrantEligible patients were pre- or post menopausal with breast cancer and histologic or cytologicconfirmation of recurrent local or distant disease progression during or within 12 months of completion of adjuvant endocrinetherapy or while receiving or within 1 month after receivingendocrine therapy for MBC347 / 174low
conclusif
  • inconclusive 19 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 58 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
ribociclib plus fulvestrant
MONALEESA-3, 2018
  NCT02422615
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)ribociclib plus fulvestrantplacebo plus fulvestrantPostmenopausal women and men with confirmed HR-positive and HER2-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer484 / 242low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 28 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 41 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • suggested 27 % decrease in deaths (OS) (extension)
sapanisertib plus fulvestrant
NCT02756364 (sapanisertib daily), 2022
  NCT02756364
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)sapanasertib plus fulvestrantfulvestrantPostmenopausal women with histologic confirmation of ER-positive and HER2-negative metastatic or advanced BC47 / 46some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 23 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
NCT02756364 (sapanisertib weekly), 2022
  NCT02756364
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)sapinasertib plus fulvestrantfulvestrantPostmenopausal women with histologic confirmation of ER-positive and HER2-negative metastatic or advanced BC48 / 46NA
inconclusive
    no statistically significant result
versus paclitaxel
alisertib plus paclitaxel
NCT02187991 - HR-positive and HER2-negative cohort, 2021
  NCT02187991
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)alisertib plus paclitaxelpaclitaxelPostemenopausal women (aged >= 18yr) with metastatic or unresectable locally recurrent BC confirmed as ER-positive (HR-positive), ERBB2-negative (HER2-negative) invasive BCor grade 3 TNBC69 / 70high
suggested
  • suggested 44 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
versus placebo
metformin
Pimentel, 2019
  NCT01310231
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2)metformin plus chemotherapyplacebo plus chemotherapyWomen with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced BC, about to receive 1st to 4th line, any HR or HER2 status22 / 18NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 20 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
These results do not support the use of metformin with chemotherapy in non-diabetic MBC patients.

la/mBC - HR positive - L2 - all population breast cancer - HR positive la/mBC - HR positive la/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2) la/mBC - HR positive - L2 - all population

versus fulvestrant
buparlisib plus fulvestrant
BELLE-2 (full population), 2017
  NCT01610284
RCTla/mBC - HR positive - L2 - all populationbuparlisib plus fulvestrantplacebo plus fulvestrantPostmenopausal women (>=18yr), with histollogically confirmed HR-positive and HER2-negative inoperable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (with progession on or after aromatase ihnibitor treatment)576 / 571low
conclusif
  • inconclusive 13 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 22 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)

la/mBC - HR positive - L2 - PIK3CA mutant breast cancer - HR positive la/mBC - HR positive la/mBC - HR-positive - 2nd line (L2) la/mBC - HR positive - L2 - PIK3CA mutant

versus fulvestrant
buparlisib plus fulvestrant
BELLE-2 (PI3K pathway activated), 2017
  NCT01610284
RCTla/mBC - HR positive - L2 - PIK3CA mutantbuparlisib plus fulvestrantplacebo plus fulvestrantPostmenopausal women (>=18yr), with histollogically confirmed HR-positive and HER2-negative inoperable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (with progession on or after aromatase ihnibitor treatment). This subgroup population included only patients with PI3K pathway activated188 / 184low
suggested
  • suggested 24 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)

es-BC - TNBC - NA - all population breast cancer - triple negative es-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA) es-BC - TNBC - NA - all population

versus carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel
atezolizumab plus carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel
NeoTRIPaPDLA unpublished
  NCT02620280
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationatezolizumab plus carboplatine plus nab-paclitaxelcarboplatine plus nab-paclitaxelNeoadjuvant Therapy in TRIPle Negative Breast Cancer (early or locally advanced)88 / 86NA
inconclusive
    no statistically significant result
versus placebo
durvalumab alone
GeparNuevo, 2019
  NCT02685059
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationdurvalumab followed by nab-paclitaxelplacebo followed by nab-paclitaxelPatients with previously untreated uni- or bilateral primary, non-metastatic invasive TNBC with a tumour of at least 2 cm (cT2-cT4a-d) treated as neoadjuvant88 / 86some concern
suggested
  • suggested 76 % decrease in deaths (OS) (extension)
  • inconclusive 45 % increase in pCR (PE)
olaparib
OlympiA (BIG 6-13, NSABP B-55) unpublished
  NCT02032823
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationolaparibplacebopatients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative early breast cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants and high-risk clinicopathological factors921 / 915NA
conclusif
  • demonstrated 32 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 42 % decrease in iDFS (PE)
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE-522, 2020
  NCT03036488
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationpembrolizumabplacebopreviously previously untreated, nonmetastatic disease, stage II or stage III, triple-negative breast cancer treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin, treated for neoadjuvant phase and an adjuvant phase;784 / 390low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 12.6-fold increase in pCR (PE)
  • suggested 37 % decrease in events or deaths (EFS) (PE)
versus placebo plus SoC
atezolizumab plus nab-paclitxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide
IMpassion-031 (all population), 2020
  NCT03197935
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - all populationAtezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim supportplacebo plus nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim supportneoadjuvant setting in participants with early stage (stage II-III) triple negative breast cancer165 / 168low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 95 % increase in pCR (PE)

es-BC - TNBC - NA - PDL1 positive breast cancer - triple negative es-BC - Triple negatif (TNBC) - (neo)adjuvant (NA) es-BC - TNBC - NA - PDL1 positive

versus placebo plus SoC
atezolizumab plus nab-paclitxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide
IMpassion-031 (PDL1>1%), 2020
  NCT03197935
RCTes-BC - TNBC - NA - PDL1 positiveAtezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim supportplacebo plus nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim supportneoadjuvant setting in participants with early stage (stage II III) triple negative breast cancer with PDL1 >1%78 / 76low
suggested
  • suggested 1.2-fold increase in pCR (PE)

mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1) breast cancer - triple negative mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1)

versus Standard of Care (SoC)
capivasertib plus paclitaxel
PAKT (PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered), 2020
  NCT02423603
RCTmBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1)capiversatib plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelPatients had histologically confirmed, metastatic or locally advanced TNBC not amenable to curative resection. Previous systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease was not permitted, but previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy was allowed.17 / 11NA
suggested
  • suggested 70 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS)

mBC - TNBC - L1 - all population breast cancer - triple negative mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1) mBC - TNBC - L1 - all population

versus placebo plus SoC
pembrolizumab plus SoC
KEYNOTE-355 (all population), 2020
  NCT02819518
RCTmBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationPembrolizumab plus chemotherapyplacebo plus chemotherapypatients with with untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (all population)566 / 281low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 11 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • suggested 18 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 76 % decrease in objective responses (ORR)
OS results from ESMO Congres 2021
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel
IMpassion-130 (all population), 2018
  NCT02425891
RCTmBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationatezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxelplacebo plus nab-paclitaxelpatients with untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with nab-paclitaxel451 / 451low
conclusif
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 20 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • suggested 20 % decrease in PFS (extension)
atezolizumab plus paclitaxel
IMpassion-131 (all population), 2020
  NCT03125902
RCTmBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationAtezolizumab plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelPatients had metastatic or unresectable locally advanced measurable TNBC, had received no prior chemotherapy or targeted therapy for aTNBC and had completed any prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer 12 months before being randomised to the trial.431 / 220NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
Atezolizumab (Tecentriq) in combination with paclitaxel did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) as a first-line treatment for patients with PD-L1–positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) / qualitative results only NO ROB
capivasertib plus paclitaxel
PAKT (all population), 2020
  NCT02423603
RCTmBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationcapiversatib plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelPatients had histologically confirmed, metastatic or locally advanced TNBC not amenable to curative resection. Previous systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease was not permitted, but previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy was allowed.70 / 70NA
suggested
  • suggested 39 % decrease in deaths (OS)
  • inconclusive 26 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
ipatasertib plus paclitaxel
LOTUS, 2017
  NCT02162719
RCTmBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationipatasertib plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelWomen with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC not amenable to curative resection. Previous systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease was not permitted. Previous (neo)adjuvant treatment completed at least 6 months before the first dose was allowed62 / 62NA
suggested
  • suggested 40 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
veliparib plus paclitaxel plus carboplatin
BrighTNess (velaparib-P-C (arm A) vs paclitaxel - carboplatin (arm B)), 2018
  NCT02032277
RCTmBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationveliparib plus paclitaxel plus carboplatinplacebo plus paclitaxel plus carboplatinPatients: women who had histologically or cytologically confirmed invasive TNBC, clinical stage II-III316 / 160NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 12 % increase in events or deaths (EFS) (PE)
  • inconclusive 25 % increase in events or deaths (EFS) (PE)
  • inconclusive 16 % decrease in pCR (PE)
BrighTNess (velaparib-P-C (arm A) vs paclitaxel alone (arm C)), 2018
  NCT02032277
RCTmBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationveliparib plus paclitaxel plus carboplatinplacebo matching veliparib plus placebo matching carboplatin plus paclitaxelPatients: women who had histologically or cytologically confirmed invasive TNBC, clinical stage II-III316 / 158NA
conclusif
  • inconclusive 18 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 1.5-fold increase in pCR (PE)
  • suggested 37 % decrease in events or deaths (EFS) (PE)

mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positive breast cancer - triple negative mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1) mBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positive

versus placebo plus SoC
pembrolizumab plus SoC
KEYNOTE-355 (CPS>10), 2020
  NCT02819518
RCTmBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumab plus chemotherapyplacebo plus chemotherapypatients with with untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (PDL1 CPS>10)220 / 103low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 27 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 34 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
OS results from ESMO Congres 2021
KEYNOTE-355 (CPS>1), 2020
  NCT02819518
RCTmBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumab plus chemotherapyplacebo plus chemotherapypatients with with untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (PDL1 CPS>1)425 / 211low
suggested
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • suggested 25 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
OS results from ESMO Congres 2021
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel
IMpassion-130 (PDL1>1%), 2018
  NCT02425891
RCTmBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positiveatezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxelplacebo plus nab-paclitaxelpatients with untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated with nab-paclitaxel, and PDL1 positive population (>1%)185 / 184low
conclusif
  • suggested 29 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 38 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • suggested 37 % decrease in PFS (extension)
atezolizumab plus paclitaxel
IMpassion-131 (PD-L1 > 1%), 2020
  NCT03125902
RCTmBC - TNBC - L1 - PDL1 positiveAtezolizumab plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelPatients had metastatic or unresectable locally advanced measurable TNBC, had received no prior chemotherapy or targeted therapy for aTNBC and had completed any prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer 12 months before being randomised to the trial.191 / 101NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 18 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)

mBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2) breast cancer - triple negative mBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2)

versus Standard of Care (SoC)
sacituzumab govitecan
ASCENT (patients without brain metastases), 2021
  NCT02574455
RCTmBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2)Sacituzumab govitecansingle agent chemotheraopy² of the physician's choice (eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine or gemcitabine)Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer that was relapsed or refractory to two or more previous standard chemotherapy regimens for unresectable, locally andvanced or metastatic disease (previous thearapy had to include taxanes).235 / 233NA
suggested
  • suggested 52 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • suggested 59 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
ASCENT (all population), 2021
  NCT02574455
RCTmBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2)Sacituzumab govitecansingle agent chemotheraopy of the physician's choice (eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine or gemcitabine)Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer that was relapsed or refractory to two or more previous standard chemotherapy regimens for unresectable, locally andvanced or metastatic disease (previous thearapy had to include taxanes).267 / 262NA
suggested
  • suggested 49 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • suggested 57 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
talazoparib
EMBRACA, 2018
  NCT01945775
RCTmBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2)talazoparibchemotherapyPatients with HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and a deleterious or suspected deleterious gBRCA1/2 mutation. Patients had received 3 or less previous cytotoxic regimens for advanced disease and previous treatment with a taxane, an anthracycline, or both (unless contraindicated).287 / 144NA
conclusif
  • inconclusive 15 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 46 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 4.0-fold increase in objective responses (ORR) (PE)

mBC - TNBC - L2 - all population breast cancer - triple negative mBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2) mBC - TNBC - L2 - all population

versus Standard of Care (SoC)
olaparib
OlympiAD, 2017
  NCT02000622
RCTmBC - TNBC - L2 - all populationolaparibstandard chemotherapyPatients with HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer that was HR positive or triple negative. Patients had a confirmed deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA mutation and had receive no more than 2 previous chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease.205 / 97NA
conclusif
  • inconclusive 10 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 42 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE-119 (all population), 2019
  NCT02555657
RCTmBC - TNBC - L2 - all populationPembrolizumabchemotherapy (single agent)patients with previously treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC)312 / 310some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 3 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 60 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS)
  • statistically significant 40 % decrease in DCR,DCR

mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positive breast cancer - triple negative mBC-Triple negative (TNBC) - 2nd Line (L2) mBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positive

versus Standard of Care (SoC)
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE-119 (PDL1 CPS>10), 2019
  NCT02555657
RCTmBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumabchemotherapy (single agent)patients with previously treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients with PDL1 CPS> 10 only96 / 98some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 22 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS) (PE)
KEYNOTE-119 (PDL1 CPS>1), 2019
  NCT02555657
RCTmBC - TNBC - L2 - PDL1 positivePembrolizumabchemotherapy (single agent)patients with previously treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients with PDL1 CPS> 1 only203 / 202some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 35 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS)

metastatic/advanced - breast cancer (mBC) metastatic/advanced - breast cancer (mBC)

versus chemotherapy
trastuzumab deruxtecan
DESTINY-Breast04, 2022
  NCT03734029
RCTmetastatic/advanced - breast cancer (mBC)trastuzumab deruxtecanphysician’s choice of chemotherapypatients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer who had received one or two previous lines of chemotherapy373 / 184some concern
conclusif
  • demonstrated 36 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 50 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)