Study study type PathologyT1T0Patientssample sizesROB Results

la/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1) breast cancer - HR positive la/mBC - HR positive la/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)

versus paclitaxel
capivasertib plus paclitaxel
BEECH, 2019
  NCT01625286
RCTla/mBC - HR-positive - 1st line (L1)capivasertib plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelpatients with ER-positive advanced breast cancer with or without a PIK3CA mutation receiving chemotherapy for the first time in the advanced setting54 / 56low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 20 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)

mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1) breast cancer - triple negative mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1)

versus Standard of Care (SoC)
capivasertib plus paclitaxel
PAKT (PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered), 2020
  NCT02423603
RCTmBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1)capiversatib plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelPatients had histologically confirmed, metastatic or locally advanced TNBC not amenable to curative resection. Previous systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease was not permitted, but previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy was allowed.17 / 11NA
suggested
  • suggested 70 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS)

mBC - TNBC - L1 - all population breast cancer - triple negative mBC - Triple negative (TNBC) - 1st Line (L1) mBC - TNBC - L1 - all population

versus Standard of Care (SoC)
capivasertib plus paclitaxel
PAKT (all population), 2020
  NCT02423603
RCTmBC - TNBC - L1 - all populationcapiversatib plus paclitaxelplacebo plus paclitaxelPatients had histologically confirmed, metastatic or locally advanced TNBC not amenable to curative resection. Previous systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease was not permitted, but previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy was allowed.70 / 70NA
suggested
  • suggested 39 % decrease in deaths (OS)
  • inconclusive 26 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)