Study study type PathologyT1T0Patientssample sizesROB Results

mML - NA - all population metastatic/adv melanoma (mML) mML - (neo)adjuvant (NA) mML - NA - all population

versus Ipilimumab (10 mg/kg)
nivolumab alone
CheckMate 238, 2017
  NCT02388906
RCTmML - NA - all populationnivolumabipilimumabpatient, 15 years of age or older, with high-risk resected stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV melanoma as adjuvant treatment453 / 453low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 35 % decrease in RFS/DFS (PE)
  • suggested 27 % decrease in MFS
  • suggested 29 % decrease in RFS (extension)
versus placebo
nivolumab alone
IMMUNED (N vs P ; all population), 2020
  NCT02523313
RCTmML - NA - all populationnivolumabplaceboadjuvant therapy with nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab compared with placebo in patients with stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease59 / 52low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 44 % decrease in RFS/DFS (PE)
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE 054 (all population), 2018
  NCT02362594
RCTmML - NA - all populationpembrolizumabplacebopatients with complete Resection of High-Risk Stage III Melanoma, stage IIIA, IIIB or IIIC melanoma with no in-transit metastases,514 / 505low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 43 % decrease in RFS/DFS (PE)
  • suggested 47 % decrease in MFS
  • suggested 44 % decrease in RFS (extension)
  • suggested 41 % decrease in RFS (extension)
  • more...

mML - NA - PDL1 positive metastatic/adv melanoma (mML) mML - (neo)adjuvant (NA) mML - NA - PDL1 positive

versus placebo
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE 054 (PDL1>1%), 2018
  NCT02362594
RCTmML - NA - PDL1 positivepembrolizumabplacebopatients with complete Resection of High-Risk Stage III Melanoma, stage IIIA, IIIB or IIIC melanoma with no in-transit metastases, with PDL1 positive status428 / 425low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 46 % decrease in RFS/DFS (PE)
  • suggested 43 % decrease in RFS (extension)
  • demonstrated 40 % decrease in DMFS (PE)

mML - L1 - all population metastatic/adv melanoma (mML) mML - 1st line (L1) mML - L1 - all population

versus ipilimumab alone
nivolumab alone
CheckMate 067 (N vs I ; all population), 2015
  NCT01844505
RCTmML - L1 - all populationnivolumabipilimumabwith previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic histologically confirmed stage III or IV melanoma.316 / 315low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 37 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 43 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • suggested 37 % decrease in deaths (OS) (extension)
  • suggested 47 % decrease in PFS (extension)
  • more...
versus ipilimumab followed by nivolumab
nivolumab followed by ipilimumab
CheckMate 064, 2016
  NCT01783938
RCTmML - L1 - all populationnivolumab followed by ipilimumabipilimumab followed by nivolumabunresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma, and were previously untreated or had progressed after no more than one previous systemic therapy68 / 70high
suggested
  • suggested 52 % decrease in deaths (OS)

mML - L1 - BRAF mutant metastatic/adv melanoma (mML) mML - 1st line (L1) mML - L1 - BRAF mutant

versus placebo plus SoC
atezolizumab plus SoC
IMspire-150 (BRAF mutant), 2020
  NCT02908672
RCTmML - L1 - BRAF mutantatezolizumab plus cobimetinib plus vemurafenibplacebo plus cobimetinib plus vemurafenibpatients previously untreated BRAFv600 mutation-positive metastatic or unresectable locally advanced melanoma.256 / 258low
suggested
  • suggested 22 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)

mML - L1 - BRAF wild metastatic/adv melanoma (mML) mML - 1st line (L1) mML - L1 - BRAF wild

versus dacarbazine
nivolumab alone
CheckMate 066, 2015
  NCT01721772
RCTmML - L1 - BRAF wildnivolumabdacarbazinepreviously untreated patients who had unresectable metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation (stage III or IV).210 / 208low
conclusif
  • demonstrated 58 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 57 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • suggested 54 % decrease in deaths (OS) (extension)
  • suggested 58 % decrease in PFS (extension)
  • more...
versus pembrolizumab alone
atezolizumab plus cometinib
IMspire-170, 2020
  NCT03273153
RCTmML - L1 - BRAF wildcometinib plus atezolizumabpembrolizumabpatient with confirmed locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic melanoma that was negative for BRAFV600 mutations with no prior systemic treatment for advanced melanoma.222 / 224some concern
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 15 % increase in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)

mML - L2 - all population metastatic/adv melanoma (mML) mML - 2nd line (L2) mML - L2 - all population

versus ipilimumab alone
pembrolizumab (10mg/kg)
KEYNOTE-006 (3 week), 2015
  NCT01866319
RCTmML - L2 - all populationpembrolizumab every 3 wkipilimumabhistologically confirmed, unresectable stage III or IV melanoma and had received no more than one previous systemic therapy for advanced disease277 / 278some concern
conclusif
  • demonstrated 31 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 42 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • suggested 32 % decrease in deaths (OS) (extension)
  • suggested 39 % decrease in PFS (extension)
pembrolizumab (10mg/kg) 2 weeks
KEYNOTE-006 (2 week), 2015
  NCT01866319
RCTmML - L2 - all populationpembrolizumab every 2 wkipilimumabhistologically confirmed, unresectable stage III or IV melanoma and had received no more than one previous systemic therapy for advanced disease279 / 278some concern
conclusif
  • demonstrated 37 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 42 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
  • suggested 32 % decrease in deaths (OS) (extension)
  • suggested 39 % decrease in PFS (extension)
versus Standard of Care (SoC)
nivolumab alone
CheckMate 037, 2015
  NCT01721746
RCTmML - L2 - all populationnivolumabchemotherapy (investigator’s choice)patients with advanced melanoma (unresectable stage IIIC or IV metastatic melanoma, who progressed after ipilimumab, or ipilimumab and a BRAF inhibitor if they were BRAFV mutation-positive (second-line or later-line treatment).272 / 133high
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 5 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • suggested 2.4-fold increase in objective responses (ORR) (PE)
pembrolizumab (10mg/kg)
KEYNOTE-002 (10 mg/kg), 2015
  NCT01704287
RCTmML - L2 - all populationpembrolizumabICC (carboplatin plus paclitaxel, dacarbazine, paclitaxel alone or oral temozolomid)18 years or older with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma, not amenable to local therapy; confirmed disease progression within 24 weeks of the last ipilimumab dose, previous BRAF or MEK inhibitor therapy or both,181 / 179some concern
conclusif
  • suggested 26 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 50 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)
pembrolizumab (2mg/kg)
KEYNOTE-002 (2 mg/kg), 2015
  NCT01704287
RCTmML - L2 - all populationpembrolizumabICC (carboplatin plus paclitaxel, dacarbazine, paclitaxel alone or oral temozolomid)unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma not amenable to local therapy; confirmed disease progression14 within 24 weeks of the last ipilimumab dose180 / 179some concern
conclusif
  • inconclusive 14 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • demonstrated 43 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)

mML - L2 - BRAF mutant metastatic/adv melanoma (mML) mML - 2nd line (L2) mML - L2 - BRAF mutant

versus placebo plus SoC
pembrolizumab plus SoC
KEYNOTE-022, 2019
  NCT02130466
RCTmML - L2 - BRAF mutantpembrolizumab, with dabrafenib and trametinibplacebo with dabrafenib and trametinibpatients with BRAFV600-mutant with advanced unresectable stage III or metastatic stage IV melanoma AND has received prior systemic therapy60 / 60low
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 34 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS) (PE)