studies

la/mBC - HER2 positive - 1st Line (L1), trastuzumab based treatment vs. HER inhibitor, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsCLEOPATRA, 2012 0.66 [0.52; 0.84] SYSUCC-002, 2022 0.82 [0.65; 1.04] 0.74[0.60; 0.91]CLEOPATRA, 2012, SYSUCC-002, 2022238%1,200moderatenot evaluable deaths (OS) (extension)detailed resultsCLEOPATRA, 2012 0.69 [0.58; 0.82] 0.69[0.58; 0.82]CLEOPATRA, 201210%808NAnot evaluable PFS (extension)detailed resultsCLEOPATRA, 2012 0.69 [0.59; 0.81] 0.69[0.59; 0.81]CLEOPATRA, 201210%808NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsCLEOPATRA, 2012 0.62 [0.51; 0.75] SYSUCC-002, 2022 0.88 [0.71; 1.09] 0.74[0.52; 1.04]CLEOPATRA, 2012, SYSUCC-002, 2022282%1,200lownot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsCLEOPATRA, 2012 10.80 [5.29; 22.05] 10.80[5.29; 22.05]CLEOPATRA, 201210%679NAnot evaluable0.520.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-05-18 23:16 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 146 - treatments: 1299,1334,1332,1303,1325,1320,1305,1300,1429,1324,1335,1307,1322