Study study type PathologyT1T0Patientssample sizesROB Results

mEC - 2nd line (L2) metastatic/advanced - esophageal cancer (mEC) mEC - 2nd line (L2)

versus Standard of Care (SoC)
camrelizumab alone
ESCORT, 2020
  NCT03099382
RCTmEC - 2nd line (L2)camrelizumabdocetaxel or irinotecanpatients aged 18 to 75 years with a histological or cytological diagnosis of advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, had progressed on, or were intolerant to, first-line standard therapy.228 / 220high
conclusif
  • demonstrated 29 % decrease in deaths (OS),deaths (OS) (PE)
  • suggested 31 % decrease in progression or deaths (PFS),progression or deaths (PFS)
nivolumab alone
ATTRACTION-3, 2019
  NCT02569242
RCTmEC - 2nd line (L2)NivolumabICC Docetaxel/PaclitaxelPatients With Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent (squamous or adenosquamous) Esophageal (including the oesophagogastric junction) Cancer who have failed in standard chemotherapies.210 / 209high
conclusif
  • demonstrated 23 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
  • statistically significant 64 % decrease in DCR
pembrolizumab alone
KEYNOTE-181, 2020
  NCT02564263
RCTmEC - 2nd line (L2)Pembrolizumabchemotherapy ICC (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan)Subjects With Advanced/Metastatic Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus/ or Siewert type I adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) That Have Progressed After First-Line Standard Therapy314 / 314NA
inconclusive
  • inconclusive 11 % decrease in deaths (OS) (PE)
(Pembrolizumab significantly improved OS compared with chemo as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer with PD-L1 CPS ≥10) => no stat plan