| Study | study type
|
Pathology | T1 | T0 | Patients | sample sizes | ROB | Results | deaths (OS) E | progression or deaths (PFS) E | RFS/DFS E | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
metastatic/advanced OC (mOC) - 2nd line (L2) metastatic/advanced OC (mOC) - 2nd line (L2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
versus nivolumab alone | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nivolumab plus ipilimumab | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NRG GY003, 2020 NCT02498600 | RCT | metastatic/advanced OC (mOC) - 2nd line (L2) | nivolumab plus ipilimumab | nivolumab | patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian,primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma of all histologic types except mucinous adenocarcinoma andcarcinosarcoma with history of primary platinum-basedchemotherapy with a maximum of three prior cytotoxicregimens and with at least one regimen for recurrentdisease containing a platinum or a taxane | 49 / 51 | some concern | inconclusive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-
About us
-
Contact us
-
Method
-
RSS
Made with
in Lyon
-
Credits
-
Privacy policy
-
