studies

endometrial cancer, lenvatinib in association vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsKEYNOTE-775, 2023 0.65 [0.55; 0.77] 0.65[0.55; 0.77]KEYNOTE-775, 202310%827NAnot evaluable PFS (extension)detailed resultsKEYNOTE-775, 2023 0.56 [0.48; 0.66] 0.56[0.48; 0.66]KEYNOTE-775, 202310%827NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsKEYNOTE-775, 2023 0.56 [0.47; 0.66] 0.56[0.47; 0.66]KEYNOTE-775, 202310%NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsKEYNOTE-775, 2023 2.97 [2.12; 4.18] 2.97[2.12; 4.18]KEYNOTE-775, 202310%827NAnot evaluable AE (any grade)detailed resultsKEYNOTE-775, 2023 2.10 [0.19; 23.24] 2.10[0.19; 23.24]KEYNOTE-775, 202310%794NAnot evaluable AE (grade 3-5)detailed resultsKEYNOTE-775, 2023 3.26 [2.19; 4.85] 3.26[2.19; 4.85]KEYNOTE-775, 202310%794NAnot evaluable AE leading to treatment discontinuation (any grade)detailed resultsKEYNOTE-775, 2023 7.41 [4.88; 11.26] 7.41[4.88; 11.26]KEYNOTE-775, 202310%794NAnot evaluable SAE (any grade)detailed resultsKEYNOTE-775, 2023 2.94 [2.20; 3.94] 2.94[2.20; 3.94]KEYNOTE-775, 202310%794NAnot evaluable0.210.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-09-21 02:19 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 77,383 - treatments: 1477