studies

mML - NA - PDL1 positive, pembrolizumab alone vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias RFS (extension)detailed resultsKEYNOTE 054 (PDL1>1%), 2018 0.57 [0.43; 0.75] 0.57[0.43; 0.75]KEYNOTE 054 (PDL1>1%), 201810%853NAnot evaluable RFS/DFSdetailed resultsKEYNOTE 054 (PDL1>1%), 2018 0.54 [0.42; 0.69] 0.54[0.42; 0.69]KEYNOTE 054 (PDL1>1%), 201810%853NAnot evaluable DMFSdetailed resultsKEYNOTE 054 (PDL1>1%), 2018 0.60 [0.49; 0.73] 0.60[0.49; 0.73]KEYNOTE 054 (PDL1>1%), 201810%853NAnot evaluable0.22.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-06-07 19:52 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 235 - treatments: 359,575,577,576,869