studies

urothelial cancer (UC) - bladder cancer (BC), atezolizumab plus SoC vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 0.83 [0.69; 1.00] 0.83[0.69; 1.00]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%851NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 0.82 [0.70; 0.96] 0.82[0.70; 0.96]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%851NAnot evaluable CRR detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.96 [1.21; 3.17] 1.96[1.21; 3.17]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%851NAnot evaluable DORdetailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 0.70 [0.46; 1.08] 0.70[0.46; 1.08]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%386NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.15 [0.88; 1.51] 1.15[0.88; 1.51]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%851NAnot evaluable AE (any grade)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 2.34 [0.43; 12.83] 2.34[0.43; 12.83]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 0.92 [0.63; 1.34] 0.92[0.63; 1.34]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable AE leading to death (grade 5)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.27 [0.70; 2.27] 1.27[0.70; 2.27]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable AE leading to treatment discontinuation (any grade)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.05 [0.79; 1.40] 1.05[0.79; 1.40]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%850NAnot evaluable SAE (any grade)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.11 [0.85; 1.46] 1.11[0.85; 1.46]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable STRAE (any grade)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.33 [0.99; 1.80] 1.33[0.99; 1.80]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable TRAE (any grade)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.04 [0.53; 2.03] 1.04[0.53; 2.03]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable TRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.02 [0.72; 1.43] 1.02[0.72; 1.43]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable TRAE leading to death (grade 5)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.96 [0.60; 6.40] 1.96[0.60; 6.40]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Anaemia TRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.11 [0.67; 1.84] 1.11[0.67; 1.84]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Asthenia TRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 2.00 [0.82; 4.92] 2.00[0.82; 4.92]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Decreased appetite TRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 2.59 [0.27; 25.03] 2.59[0.27; 25.03]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Fatigue TRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 2.61 [0.70; 9.73] 2.61[0.70; 9.73]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Nausea TRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.73 [0.31; 9.49] 1.73[0.31; 9.49]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Neutropenia TRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 2.01 [1.12; 3.62] 2.01[1.12; 3.62]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Pruritus TRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.72 [0.06; 51.51] 1.72[0.06; 51.51]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Rash TRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 0.86 [0.02; 43.49] 0.86[0.02; 43.49]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Thrombocytopenia TRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.11 [0.55; 2.26] 1.11[0.55; 2.26]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Anaemia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.08 [0.82; 1.42] 1.08[0.82; 1.42]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Asthenia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.43 [0.81; 2.50] 1.43[0.81; 2.50]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Fatigue AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 0.66 [0.37; 1.17] 0.66[0.37; 1.17]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Febrile neutropenia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.76 [0.81; 3.80] 1.76[0.81; 3.80]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Hypertension AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 2.22 [1.05; 4.68] 2.22[1.05; 4.68]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Leucopenia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 0.74 [0.44; 1.24] 0.74[0.44; 1.24]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Nausea AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 0.54 [0.23; 1.27] 0.54[0.23; 1.27]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Neutropenia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.38 [1.03; 1.84] 1.38[1.03; 1.84]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Thrombocytopenia AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 1.25 [0.89; 1.76] 1.25[0.89; 1.76]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable Vomiting AE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsIMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 2020 0.86 [0.37; 2.00] 0.86[0.37; 2.00]IMvigor-130 (At-arm A vs Pl-arm C), 202010%843NAnot evaluable0.25.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-05-30 08:34 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 11,288,153,157,290,155,154,289,188,189,239,158,252,253,76,238,236,237 - treatments: 866