studies

la/mBC - HR positive - L2 - all population, buparlisib based treatment vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsBELLE-2 (full population), 2017 0.87 [0.74; 1.02] 0.87[0.74; 1.02]BELLE-2 (full population), 201710%1,147NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsBELLE-2 (full population), 2017 0.78 [0.68; 0.90] 0.78[0.68; 0.90]BELLE-2 (full population), 201710%1,147NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsBELLE-2 (full population), 2017 1.60 [1.08; 2.39] 1.60[1.08; 2.39]BELLE-2 (full population), 201710%1,147NAnot evaluable0.55.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-05-18 08:15 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 358 - treatments: 1430,1360,1431