| Outcome | Relative effect 95%CI | LoD | Trt. better when | I2 | k (RCT/OBS) | Bayesian probability | Overall ROB | Publication bias | Degree of certainty | Endpoint importance | Published MA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
efficacy endpoints 00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| deaths (OS) | 0.76 [0.67, 0.87] | < 1 | 0% | 3 studies (3/-) | 100.0 % | low | not evaluable | high | crucial | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| deaths (OS) (extension) | 0.73 [0.59, 0.90] | < 1 | 0% | 1 study (1/-) | 99.9 % | NA | not evaluable | important | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| progression or deaths (PFS) | 0.51 [0.44, 0.59] | < 1 | 32% | 5 studies (5/-) | 100.0 % | low | not evaluable | high | important | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CBR | 1.68 [1.16, 2.43] | > 1 | 60% | 2 studies (2/-) | 99.7 % | low | not evaluable | high | non important | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| objective responses (ORR) | 2.16 [1.57, 2.97] | > 1 | 53% | 4 studies (4/-) | 100.0 % | low | not evaluable | high | non important | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias;
suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error;
inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant;
safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies;
published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE.
Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.
-
About us
-
Contact us
-
Method
-
RSS
Made with
in Lyon
-
Credits
-
Privacy policy
-
