× We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click our cookies policy for information on how to change your cookie settings.


meta|Evidence - COVID-19

Living meta-analysis and evidence synthesis of therapies for COVID19

tutorial video
En     Fr

Our approach
   

more details ...

Network meta-analysis estimations pool direct and indirect evidences. These results should be considered as exploratory given the absence of assessment of transitivity assumption plausibility. Calculations by netmeta package.

Interactive explorer of NMA results

1Tang X, 20201NIH NIAID ACTT-1, 20201LIFESAVER, 20211RECOVERY, 20221BACC Bay Tocilizumab Trial, 2020baricitinib vs. control baricitinib better 0.87 [0.77; 0.98]0.87 [0.77;0.98]baricitinib vs. control baricitinib better 0.87 [0.77; 0.98]baricitinib vs. convalescent plasma treatment 0.44 [0.04; 5.38]0.44 [0.04;5.38]baricitinib vs. convalescent plasma treatment 0.44 [0.04; 5.38]baricitinib vs. corticosteroids 0.89 [0.78; 1.01]0.89 [0.78;1.01]baricitinib vs. corticosteroids 0.89 [0.78; 1.01]baricitinib vs. remdesivir remdesivir better 1.58 [1.02; 2.44]1.58 [1.02;2.44]baricitinib vs. remdesivir remdesivir better 1.58 [1.02; 2.44]baricitinib vs. tocilizumab 0.57 [0.15; 2.13]0.57 [0.15;2.13]baricitinib vs. tocilizumab 0.57 [0.15; 2.13]control vs. baricitinib baricitinib better 1.15 [1.02; 1.30]1.15 [1.02;1.30]control vs. baricitinib baricitinib better 1.15 [1.02; 1.30]control vs. convalescent plasma treatment 0.50 [0.04; 6.17]0.50 [0.04;6.17]control vs. convalescent plasma treatment 0.50 [0.04; 6.17]control vs. corticosteroids 1.02 [0.98; 1.07]1.02 [0.98;1.07]control vs. corticosteroids 1.02 [0.98; 1.07]control vs. remdesivir remdesivir better 1.82 [1.20; 2.76]1.82 [1.20;2.76]control vs. remdesivir remdesivir better 1.82 [1.20; 2.76]control vs. tocilizumab 0.66 [0.18; 2.43]0.66 [0.18;2.43]control vs. tocilizumab 0.66 [0.18; 2.43]convalescent plasma treatment vs. baricitinib 2.30 [0.19; 28.43]2.30 [0.19;28.43]convalescent plasma treatment vs. baricitinib 2.30 [0.19; 28.43]convalescent plasma treatment vs. control 2.00 [0.16; 24.66]2.00 [0.16;24.66]convalescent plasma treatment vs. control 2.00 [0.16; 24.66]convalescent plasma treatment vs. corticosteroids 2.05 [0.17; 25.25]2.05 [0.17;25.25]convalescent plasma treatment vs. corticosteroids 2.05 [0.17; 25.25]convalescent plasma treatment vs. remdesivir 3.64 [0.28; 46.41]3.64 [0.28;46.41]convalescent plasma treatment vs. remdesivir 3.64 [0.28; 46.41]convalescent plasma treatment vs. tocilizumab 1.32 [0.08; 22.35]1.32 [0.08;22.35]convalescent plasma treatment vs. tocilizumab 1.32 [0.08; 22.35]corticosteroids vs. baricitinib 1.12 [0.99; 1.28]1.12 [0.99;1.28]corticosteroids vs. baricitinib 1.12 [0.99; 1.28]corticosteroids vs. control 0.98 [0.93; 1.02]0.98 [0.93;1.02]corticosteroids vs. control 0.98 [0.93; 1.02]corticosteroids vs. convalescent plasma treatment 0.49 [0.04; 6.03]0.49 [0.04;6.03]corticosteroids vs. convalescent plasma treatment 0.49 [0.04; 6.03]corticosteroids vs. remdesivir remdesivir better 1.78 [1.17; 2.70]1.78 [1.17;2.70]corticosteroids vs. remdesivir remdesivir better 1.78 [1.17; 2.70]corticosteroids vs. tocilizumab 0.64 [0.17; 2.38]0.64 [0.17;2.38]corticosteroids vs. tocilizumab 0.64 [0.17; 2.38]remdesivir vs. baricitinib remdesivir better 0.63 [0.41; 0.98]0.63 [0.41;0.98]remdesivir vs. baricitinib remdesivir better 0.63 [0.41; 0.98]remdesivir vs. control remdesivir better 0.55 [0.36; 0.84]0.55 [0.36;0.84]remdesivir vs. control remdesivir better 0.55 [0.36; 0.84]remdesivir vs. convalescent plasma treatment 0.28 [0.02; 3.51]0.28 [0.02;3.51]remdesivir vs. convalescent plasma treatment 0.28 [0.02; 3.51]remdesivir vs. corticosteroids remdesivir better 0.56 [0.37; 0.86]0.56 [0.37;0.86]remdesivir vs. corticosteroids remdesivir better 0.56 [0.37; 0.86]remdesivir vs. tocilizumab 0.36 [0.09; 1.43]0.36 [0.09;1.43]remdesivir vs. tocilizumab 0.36 [0.09; 1.43]tocilizumab vs. baricitinib 1.75 [0.47; 6.50]1.75 [0.47;6.50]tocilizumab vs. baricitinib 1.75 [0.47; 6.50]tocilizumab vs. control 1.52 [0.41; 5.62]1.52 [0.41;5.62]tocilizumab vs. control 1.52 [0.41; 5.62]tocilizumab vs. convalescent plasma treatment 0.76 [0.04; 12.91]0.76 [0.04;12.91]tocilizumab vs. convalescent plasma treatment 0.76 [0.04; 12.91]tocilizumab vs. corticosteroids 1.56 [0.42; 5.76]1.56 [0.42;5.76]tocilizumab vs. corticosteroids 1.56 [0.42; 5.76]tocilizumab vs. remdesivir 2.76 [0.70; 10.91]2.76 [0.70;10.91]tocilizumab vs. remdesivir 2.76 [0.70; 10.91]Risk of bias: - high: 0.0 % - some concerns: 100.0 % - low: 0.0 % - NA: 0.0 %corticosteroidsRisk of bias: - high: 0.0 % - some concerns: 100.0 % - low: 0.0 % - NA: 0.0 %remdesivirRisk of bias: - high: 0.0 % - some concerns: 0.0 % - low: 100.0 % - NA: 0.0 %convalescent plasma treatmentRisk of bias: - high: 0.0 % - some concerns: 100.0 % - low: 0.0 % - NA: 0.0 %baricitinibRisk of bias: - high: NaN - some concerns: NaN - low: NaN - NA: NaNtofacitinibRisk of bias: - high: NaN - some concerns: NaN - low: NaN - NA: NaNcasirivimab/imdevimab (Ronapreve)Risk of bias: - high: NaN - some concerns: NaN - low: NaN - NA: NaNinterferonRisk of bias: - high: 0.0 % - some concerns: 0.0 % - low: 100.0 % - NA: 0.0 %tocilizumab Risk of bias: - high: NaN - some concerns: NaN - low: NaN - NA: NaNsarilumabRisk of bias: - high: NaN - some concerns: NaN - low: NaN - NA: NaNcontroldirect evidencenetwork meta-analysis ROB:highsome concernslowNA

Click on treatment name to display related network evidence

T vs. C corticosteroidsremdesivirconvalescent plasma treatmentbaricitinibtofacitinibcasirivimab/imdevimab (Ronapreve)interferontocilizumab sarilumabcontrol
corticosteroids---1.78
1.17; 2.70
0.49
0.04; 6.03
1.12
0.99; 1.28
NANANA0.64
0.17; 2.38
NA0.98
0.93; 1.02
remdesivir0.56
0.37; 0.86
---0.28
0.02; 3.51
0.63
0.41; 0.98
NANANA0.36
0.09; 1.43
NA0.55
0.36; 0.84
convalescent plasma treatment2.05
0.17; 25.25
3.64
0.28; 46.41
---2.30
0.19; 28.43
NANANA1.32
0.08; 22.35
NA2.00
0.16; 24.66
baricitinib0.89
0.78; 1.01
1.58
1.02; 2.44
0.44
0.04; 5.38
---NANANA0.57
0.15; 2.13
NA0.87
0.77; 0.98
tofacitinibNANANANA---NANANANANA
casirivimab/imdevimab (Ronapreve)NANANANANA---NANANANA
interferonNANANANANANA---NANANA
tocilizumab 1.56
0.42; 5.76
2.76
0.70; 10.91
0.76
0.04; 12.91
1.75
0.47; 6.50
NANANA---NA1.52
0.41; 5.62
sarilumabNANANANANANANANA---NA
control1.02
0.98; 1.07
1.82
1.20; 2.76
0.50
0.04; 6.17
1.15
1.02; 1.30
NANANA0.66
0.18; 2.43
NA---

This project is supported by a grant of the French Ministry of Health (Hospital Clinical Research Program, PHRC-N) and self-funded by Hospices Civils de Lyon, CNRS UMR5558 LBBE University Lyon-1.

   

- About - Our approach - Credits Made with in Lyon - Contact us - Privacy policy - Licence Creative Commons