studies

hepatocell cancer (HCC), nivolumab based treatment vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsCheckMate 459, 2019 0.85 [0.71; 1.01] 0.85[0.71; 1.01]CheckMate 459, 201910%743NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsCheckMate 459, 2019 0.93 [0.79; 1.10] 0.93[0.79; 1.10]CheckMate 459, 201910%743NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsCheckMate 459, 2019 2.42 [1.48; 3.94] 2.42[1.48; 3.94]CheckMate 459, 201910%743NAnot evaluable STRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsCheckMate 459, 2019 0.30 [0.22; 0.41] 0.30[0.22; 0.41]CheckMate 459, 201910%743NAnot evaluable TRAE leading to discontinuation (any grade)detailed resultsCheckMate 459, 2019 0.53 [0.28; 1.00] 0.53[0.28; 1.00]CheckMate 459, 201910%743NAnot evaluable0.25.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-06-14 15:48 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 234,40,132,131,133 - treatments: 855,360,719,721,720,842,642,674,1085,863