studies

Extensive stage SCLC (Es-SCLC) - maintenance (M), nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsCheckMate 451 (NI ; all population), 2019 0.92 [0.75; 1.12] 0.92[0.75; 1.12]CheckMate 451 (NI ; all population), 201910%554NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsCheckMate 451 (NI ; all population), 2019 0.72 [0.60; 0.87] 0.72[0.60; 0.87]CheckMate 451 (NI ; all population), 201910%554NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsCheckMate 451 (NI ; all population), 2019 2.33 [1.11; 4.90] 2.33[1.11; 4.90]CheckMate 451 (NI ; all population), 201910%554NAnot evaluable TRAE (any grade)detailed resultsCheckMate 451 (NI ; all population), 2019 4.23 [2.89; 6.20] 4.23[2.89; 6.20]CheckMate 451 (NI ; all population), 201910%554NAnot evaluable TRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsCheckMate 451 (NI ; all population), 2019 12.44 [7.59; 20.41] 12.44[7.59; 20.41]CheckMate 451 (NI ; all population), 201910%554NAnot evaluable TRAE leading to death (grade 5)detailed resultsCheckMate 451 (NI ; all population), 2019 7.05 [0.86; 57.70] 7.05[0.86; 57.70]CheckMate 451 (NI ; all population), 201910%554NAnot evaluable TRAE leading to discontinuation (any grade)detailed resultsCheckMate 451 (NI ; all population), 2019 60.82 [14.79; 250.13] 60.82[14.79; 250.13]CheckMate 451 (NI ; all population), 201910%554NAnot evaluable0.5100.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-06-11 09:37 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 194 - treatments: 416,864