studies

lung cancer : small cell (SCLC), nivolumab alone vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsCheckMate 451 (N ; all population), 2019 0.84 [0.69; 1.02] 0.84[0.69; 1.02]CheckMate 451 (N ; all population), 201910%555NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsCheckMate 451 (N ; all population), 2019 0.67 [0.56; 0.81] 0.67[0.56; 0.81]CheckMate 451 (N ; all population), 201910%555NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsCheckMate 451 (N ; all population), 2019 2.93 [1.44; 5.95] 2.93[1.44; 5.95]CheckMate 451 (N ; all population), 201910%555NAnot evaluable TRAE (any grade)detailed resultsCheckMate 451 (N ; all population), 2019 1.49 [1.06; 2.08] 1.49[1.06; 2.08]CheckMate 451 (N ; all population), 201910%555NAnot evaluable TRAE (grade 3-4)detailed resultsCheckMate 451 (N ; all population), 2019 1.59 [0.90; 2.79] 1.59[0.90; 2.79]CheckMate 451 (N ; all population), 201910%555NAnot evaluable TRAE leading to death (grade 5)detailed resultsCheckMate 451 (N ; all population), 2019 0.98 [0.06; 15.78] 0.98[0.06; 15.78]CheckMate 451 (N ; all population), 201910%555NAnot evaluable TRAE leading to discontinuation (any grade)detailed resultsOut of scaleCheckMate 451 (N ; all population), 2019 20.14 [4.80; 84.52] 20.14[4.80; 84.52]CheckMate 451 (N ; all population), 201910%555NAnot evaluable0.520.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-06-02 14:48 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 55,281,194,162,172,282,193,181 - treatments: 360,719,721,720