studies

mOC - L1 - PDL1 positive, atezolizumab based treatment vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsIMagyn-050 (PDL1 >1%), 2021 0.98 [0.68; 1.41] 0.98[0.68; 1.41]IMagyn-050 (PDL1 >1%), 202110%784NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsIMagyn-050 (PDL1 >1%), 2021 0.80 [0.65; 0.99] 0.80[0.65; 0.99]IMagyn-050 (PDL1 >1%), 202110%784NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsIMagyn-050 (PDL1 >1%), 2021 1.35 [0.63; 2.91] 1.35[0.63; 2.91]IMagyn-050 (PDL1 >1%), 202110%327NAnot evaluable0.52.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-06-02 11:34 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 250 - treatments: 851,361,602,1070,671,865,744,696,1083,1281,1282,1283,1082,866