studies

mNSCLC - L2 - PDL1 positive, atezolizumab alone vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsOAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 2016 0.77 [0.64; 0.92] 0.77[0.64; 0.92]OAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 201610%684NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsOAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 2016 0.87 [0.74; 1.03] 0.87[0.74; 1.03]OAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 201610%684NAnot evaluable DORdetailed resultsOAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 2016 9.61 [3.07; 30.08] 9.61[3.07; 30.08]OAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 201610%107NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsOAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 2016 1.41 [0.93; 2.14] 1.41[0.93; 2.14]OAK (PDL1 TC 1/2/3), 201610%684NAnot evaluable0.520.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-06-18 10:16 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 177 - treatments: 361