studies

renal cell cancer (RCC), nivolumab plus cabozantinib vs. all, meta-analysis of study results

OutcomeTE95% CInkI2ROBPub. bias deaths (OS)detailed resultsCheckMate 9ER, 2021 0.60 [0.40; 0.89] 0.60[0.40; 0.89]CheckMate 9ER, 202110%651NAnot evaluable deaths (OS) (extension)detailed resultsCheckMate 9ER, 2021 0.70 [0.55; 0.90] 0.70[0.55; 0.90]CheckMate 9ER, 202110%651NAnot evaluable PFS (extension)detailed resultsCheckMate 9ER, 2021 0.56 [0.46; 0.68] 0.56[0.46; 0.68]CheckMate 9ER, 202110%651NAnot evaluable progression or deaths (PFS)detailed resultsCheckMate 9ER, 2021 0.51 [0.41; 0.64] 0.51[0.41; 0.64]CheckMate 9ER, 202110%651NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR)detailed resultsCheckMate 9ER, 2021 3.38 [2.44; 4.69] 3.38[2.44; 4.69]CheckMate 9ER, 202110%651NAnot evaluable objective responses (ORR) (extension)detailed resultsCheckMate 9ER, 2021 3.18 [2.30; 4.40] 3.18[2.30; 4.40]CheckMate 9ER, 202110%651NAnot evaluable TRAE (any grade)detailed resultsCheckMate 9ER, 2021 2.14 [1.02; 4.46] 2.14[1.02; 4.46]CheckMate 9ER, 202110%651NAnot evaluable TRAE leading to death (grade 5)detailed resultsCheckMate 9ER, 2021 0.51 [0.05; 5.61] 0.51[0.05; 5.61]CheckMate 9ER, 202110%651NAnot evaluable TRAE leading to discontinuation (any grade)detailed resultsCheckMate 9ER, 2021 1.84 [1.13; 3.00] 1.84[1.13; 3.00]CheckMate 9ER, 202110%651NAnot evaluable0.25.01.0relative treatment effectwww.metaEvidence.org2024-05-20 23:10 +02:00

TE: relative treatment effect (measured by a risk ratio, an odds ratio or an hazard ratio depending on what is reported in the papers); k: number of studies; n: total number of patients; ROB: risk of bias (ROB 2.0); Pub. bias: publication bias; OBS: observational studies; RCT: randomized clinical trials
studied treatment is better when TE > 1; studied treatment is better when TE < 1;

pathologies: 10,93,79,178,152,80 - treatments: 842